Recently in Medical Errors Category

August 16, 2010

New Study Release in JAMA Shows More ER Visits

More Visits, Less Availability

A new study released in JAMA shows that the number of annual emergency department visits between 1997 and 2007 increased from 94.9 million to 116.8 million -- nearly twice as much as would be expected for population growth.

Also published recently was the Department of Health and Human Services' 2007 Emergency Department Summary (.pdf file here). Lots of interesting statistics.

Most of the increase in ED visits were due to Medicaid patients. One quarter of the 117 million visits to the emergency department in 2007 were made by patients with Medicaid or SCHIP. Seventeen percent of visits were covered by Medicare. In other words, 42% of hospital ED visits (50 million or so) are paid for by the state or federal government.

The graph to the right from the San Francisco Chronicle shows how emergency department use by Medicaid patients is now more than five times the rate of emergency department use by patients with private insurance - and since they are from 2007, these numbers don't include the impact from the recession.

Further breakdowns in demographics from the DHHS report include high ED utilization rates for children less than 1 year old (88 visits per 100 US infants), patients older than 75 (62 visits per 100 US persons), homeless persons (72 visits per 100 population), blacks (74.6 visits per 100 black persons), and nursing home residents.

In addition, the number of "safety net" hospitals - defined as those who treat patients regardless of the ability to pay - increased by more than 40% from 2000 to 2007.

Before you start blaming Medicaid patients for health care crisis, think about why there is a disproportionate use of emergency departments by Medicaid patients. If you or your child has a medical problem and few private physicians will accept your insurance, what are you supposed to do? You go to a place where they will accept your insurance and you get relatively timely care (as opposed to an appointment 4 months in the future). Although there are undoubtedly people that abuse the Medicaid system, in general, it isn't the patient's fault for having Medicaid. It is the fault of the government for failing to adequately fund and monitor the Medicaid program.

With the increase in visits, there are longer waits and less availability of medical care.

Bookmark and Share
July 14, 2010

Health Care Reform May Mean Longer ER Waiting Time

Researchers have predicted that the new health care bill will mean longer waiting times at emergency rooms across the United States.

The new health care bill will insure 32 million Americans and add 16 million patients to Medicaid. Medicaid patients are by far the largest consumers of emergency room and such a large addition may place a strain on the already under staffed and over worked emergency room. The study also found that there is a shortage of family care physicians in the neighborhoods where the majority of the newly insured live.

Longer wait time at the emergency can be a matter of life of death. Also the more patients using the emergency room for situations that are not an emergency can cripple the staff and send many away without proper care.


Related Sources:
Claim: Health Reform Will Mean Longer ER Wait Time

Bookmark and Share
March 16, 2010

Maternal Mortality Rate on the Rise

Maternal mortality is rare but has nearly doubled in the last decade. A death is considered a maternal mortality if it can be attributed to a delivery complication up to 42 days after delivery. The most common causes of maternal mortality are hemorrhaging, uncontrolled blood pressure and a fatal blood clot. The healthy community along with the federal government is alarmed at this spike in deaths especially after a more concentrated effort has been established to prevent such occurrences.

Pregnancies are changing in the United States and so far delivery procedures have been behind the curve. Almost one third of all deliveries are now cesarean which is a major surgery and can lead to more hemorrhaging than a vaginal delivery. Also women who have c-sections are more likely to have future babies also delivered by c-section which can be riskier than a second vaginal delivery. Women are also more likely to be obese than in the past leading to higher blood pressure and diabetes that can cause complications after delivery.

Perhaps the most startling cause of death is a deep vein thrombosis or DVT which is a blood clot in the leg that can be fatal if moves to the lung. Most pregnant women are not aware that a DVT can occur during pregnancy and after delivery but pregnancy naturally causes the body's blood to clot which can lead to problems. Women who have a c-section are more likely to suffer from DVT and hemorrhaging. Doctors and hospital must be vigilant in their attention to the patient to guard against these complications.

Currently there is not enough information available to determine why black women are three times more likely to suffer maternity mortality than white women.

Experts believe that close to half the deaths reported could have been prevented if delivery protocol would change to accommodate the changes in pregnancies.

Related Sources:
Hoped-for drop in childbirth deaths not happening

Bookmark and Share
February 11, 2010

Philadelphia Hospitals Graded on Central-Blood Line Infections

Consumer Reports conducted a nationwide study on the amount of central-blood line infections at hospitals and most hospitals in the Philadelphia area were graded above average. Pennsylvania is one of only 23 states that have a policy for all hospitals in the state to mandatory report infections.

Hundreds of thousands people die each year in hospitals due to infection with the most common being a central line infection. Central lines are catheters that are placed in a major vein to quickly deliver medication or fluids to a patient. One third of patients who die in hospitals from infections are from central line infections that occur in intensive care units.

In the Philadelphia area, St. Christopher's and Hahnemann University Hospital scored better than average along with A-I DuPont in Delaware. Surprisingly Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was graded well below average and officials from the hospital have acknowledged the problem and have implemented a system that is already producing better results.

Research has shown that central line infections are relatively easy to avoid with some very simple steps and good hygiene practices. Two thirds of infections can be prevented if hospital staff wash their hands before and after touching a patient or a catheter, disinfect the patient's skin before applying the catheter and wearing protective gear such as gloves, masks, caps, and gowns when caring for a central line patient.

Related Sources:
Consumer Reports exclusive on hospital infections

Bookmark and Share